Reduce avoidable losses
Review high-risk or high-value reimbursement evidence before payment decisions.
Evidence verification for risk teamsYour fraud stack knows
Your fraud stack knows
the customer.
We examine the evidence.
An otherwise legitimate customer can still submit altered or incomplete evidence. We examine screenshots, statements, receipts, and messages to add a documented evidence signal alongside your existing risk controls.
Illustrative example
DEMO BANKAccount statement
October 2026 · Account ending 0421
Closing balance$12,480.00
Oct 01Opening balance$10,000.00
Oct 04Transfer received+$2,750.00
Oct 08Card payment−$270.00
Oct 10Service fee−$15.00
Content consistencyDo the transactions reconcile?
The operational blind spotCustomer checks and
Customer checks and
evidence checks.
Knowing the customer does not resolve every question about the evidence.
Identity, account, transaction, and behavior checks provide valuable context. A focused interface examination asks a different question: does the submitted artifact add up?
Documented findings can help your team corroborate before payout, resolve an evidentiary gap, or escalate a recurring pattern. Your team retains the final claim decision.
Where we help
A closer look at high-stakes claims.
Spot repeatable patterns
Document recurring inconsistencies that may help your team investigate shared techniques and close loopholes.
Support defensible decisions
Use documented findings to inform escalation and case handling. Your team retains policy and adjudication control.
Our scopeScreenshots, statements, receipts,
Screenshots, statements, receipts,
and messages.
A structured framework of 12 examination points helps us test observations against available references.
Explore the 12 points of examination →Refund claimsPayment confirmationsBalance screenshotsReimbursement requestsPrice disputesCancellation confirmationsAccount statesSupport screenshots
Customer evidence
A claim to examine
Screenshots, receipts or statements
Expert review
A closer examination
Visual, technical and contextual review
Recommendation
Findings & next steps
Reasoning, limitations and escalation guidance
Your decision
Policy stays with you
Your team makes the final claim decision
Illustrative service workflow. Your team retains control of adjudication.